6.5 C
New York
Tuesday, November 24, 2020

Brazil puts an end to limitations on homosexuals and bisexuals to donate blood

Must Read

Have we been deceived? Chromosomes, like you’ve never seen them

We are used to seeing chromosomes represented in the shape of an X, but this scheme may not be...

Scientists find out how to beat coronavirus in six weeks

A new study has shown the importance of rapid testing in the fight against the COVID-19 epidemic. Rapid testing for...

China launches first-ever return mission to the moon

The Chinese spacecraft Chang'e-5 takes off from the Wenchang Satellite Launch Center in Hainan, China. The mission will last one...
Amit Kumar
Amit Kumar is editor-in-chief and founder of Revyuh Media. He has been ensuring journalistic quality and shaping the future of Revyuh.com - in terms of content, text, personnel and strategy. He also develops herself further, likes to learn new things and, as a trained mediator, considers communication and freedom to be essential in editorial cooperation. After studying and training at the Indian Institute of Journalism & Mass Communication He accompanied an ambitious Internet portal into the Afterlife and was editor of the Scroll Lib Foundation. After that He did public relations for the MNC's in India. Email: amit.kumar (at) revyuh (dot) com ICE : 00 91 (0) 99580 61723

The Brazilian Supreme Court has repealed the laws that limited homosexuals and bisexuals to donate blood, in a decision considered a human rights victory for the LGBT+ public in the South American country.

The move came after many countries revised restrictions on blood donations during the AIDS / HIV crisis in the 1980s of the last century, in which some countries imposed blanket bans, some waiting times after sex, and others, such as Italy, have no limitations.

After nearly four years in court, seven of the eleven Supreme Court justices voted on Friday to repeal guidelines that forbade men from giving blood for 12 months after having sex with another man and thus ending any waiting time.

The Supreme Court considers the current restrictions unconstitutional

The Supreme Court said the current ban was unconstitutional for imposing restrictions on gay and bisexual men, thus backing Supreme Court Minister Edson Fachin who argued that the restriction offended their basic human dignity.

“Instead of the state disabling these people from promoting the good by donating blood, it undoubtedly restricted solidarity based on prejudice and discrimination,” Fachin wrote in his vote.

This decision comes after several nations have relaxed the rules regarding blood donation in recent weeks as blood banks were in great need of donors due to the coronavirus pandemic.

AIDS caused these restrictions in the 80s

The United States, Denmark and Northern Ireland have changed the rules in which men could give blood three months after their last homosexual encounter when until now they had to wait a year, a policy that LGBT + organizations have long denounced as discriminatory.

Many countries introduced blood donation controls in the wake of the HIV / AIDS epidemic in the 1980s when infected blood, donated by drug addicts and prisoners, contaminated supplies.

But the problem increasingly became a continuing stigma totem against LGBT + people, and activists claim that individual assessments of sexual history and risk for all potential blood donors would be safer and fairer.

The case has been in the Brazilian Supreme Court since 2016

In Brazil, the case reached the Supreme Court in 2016, but it took until 2020 to reach the majority. Minister Alexandre de Moraes, one of the four who voted against overthrowing the ban imposed by the Ministry of Health, argued that the waiting period was not discriminatory but based on technical studies.

For LGBT + activists, the ruling was celebrated as a victory in a country where same-sex marriage is legal but LGBT + people often face discriminatory government policies.

“A historic victory for the LGBT population! And the measure benefits everyone who needs donations, as blood reserves are almost always insufficient,” wrote federal policy Samia Bomfim on Twitter after the decision.

- Advertisement -
- Advertisement -

Latest News

Have we been deceived? Chromosomes, like you’ve never seen them

We are used to seeing chromosomes represented in the shape of an X, but this scheme may not be...

Scientists find out how to beat coronavirus in six weeks

A new study has shown the importance of rapid testing in the fight against the COVID-19 epidemic. Rapid testing for COVID-19 of 75% of the...

China launches first-ever return mission to the moon

The Chinese spacecraft Chang'e-5 takes off from the Wenchang Satellite Launch Center in Hainan, China. The mission will last one lunar day (14 Earth days)...

These are the most reliable cars in the world

The most reliable brands ranking in the automotive market The experts who carried out the study established a score of 0 to 100 points to...

2020 won’t have a word: Oxford Dictionary fails to pick the Word of the Year 2020

Linguists were unable to write this year into one word and decided to focus on the vocabulary that characterizes the main problems of the...
- Advertisement -

More Articles Like This

- Advertisement -